Recording value check
Terms last checked against each company's own page: November 7, 2026
No buyer we checked publishes a per-hour price for call recordings. This check takes your archive's hours, years, languages, channels and consent history, and shows which published buyer ranges are the nearest reference, with the problems that would lower or stop a license.
Check your archive
What do buyers publish about pay?
| Buyer | Published range | Basis | Audio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labelbox Prism | Roughly $50K at the low end; past $1M for the biggest enterprise deals | Per dataset or partnership | Names voice, with explicit timestamped consent required |
| micro1 | Three bands: $100K–$500K, $500K–$3M, over $3M | Per company | Audio not mentioned; support records as text |
| Scale AI | $10K to $1M+, labeled "illustrative" and not guaranteed | Per partnership | Audio not mentioned; support records as text |
| Nyne | Often $100K or more | Per partnership | Audio not mentioned; support tickets |
Any license signed after one of our introductions may bring us a fee, paid by that buyer. Order and wording here ignore that: rows run from the most to the least direct mention of voice or call data.
Where these facts come from (4)
- Prism, the licensing site run by Labelbox (seen Nov. 7, 2026)
- micro1, company data page (seen Nov. 7, 2026)
- Scale AI, data partnership program (seen Nov. 7, 2026)
- Nyne: selling company data (seen Nov. 7, 2026)
Questions about what recordings are worth
How much is an hour of recorded calls worth?
No buyer page we read publishes a price per hour or per minute of call audio. The published figures are per company or per dataset, and they are ranges, not offers.
Where do the numbers in this tool come from?
Only from the buyers’ own pages, read Nov. 7, 2026. The tool picks which published ranges to show based on your answers; it does not calculate a price.
Why does the consent answer matter so much?
Because calls recorded without the consent the law required should not be licensed at any price. If the notice answer is "no" or "not sure", that is the first thing to resolve.
Will stereo recordings be worth more than mono?
None of the buyers publishes that. Stereo, with agent and caller on separate channels, is simply easier to redact and to label, which can make the archive easier to accept.
Why might a real license come in lower?
Published ranges are written to cover every kind of company data at its best. Consent gaps, non-English calls, short history, redaction work and exclusivity terms can all bring a real figure down, sometimes to nothing.
Get a quote
Three quick screens: office ZIP, a contact email, rough archive numbers. Describe the recordings here; never send them.
Introduction service only. Any fee we earn comes from the buyer, not from you.
Keep recordings, transcripts and sample files to yourself. This form cannot take attachments, and we never hold call audio.
Thanks. Your answers are in.
- We hold your answers up against every buyer's own stated limits on size, country, consent and content.
- An email follows with the names that match and the reasons, or a plain no if nothing matches.
- Your company stays unnamed to every buyer until that email gets a yes from you.
- Until then, leave the recordings where they are. No audio should go to anyone, us included.